Jul 11, 2012

Review: Shadow of Night by Deborah Harkness

Series: All Souls Trilogy 2
Format: ARC (NetGalley)
Excerpt here
Release Date: July 10, 2012
Purchase: Amazon | Barnes & Noble | Book Depository

Now, picking up from A Discovery of Witches’ cliffhanger ending, Shadow of Night plunges Diana and Matthew into Elizabethan London, a world of spies, subterfuge, and a coterie of Matthew’s old friends, the mysterious School of Night that includes Christopher Marlowe and Walter Raleigh. Here, Diana must locate a witch to tutor her in magic, Matthew is forced to confront a past he thought he had put to rest, and the mystery of Ashmole 782 deepens.


When I first came across Discovery of Witches BTS (Before Talk Supe) I coveted the book mainly because of the cover and all the rave reviews I've read pertaining to Deborah Harkness' debut novel. As for the story, I liked it enough but it was challenging to read because of the length and the pace. DHarkness took her time in building Diana and Matthew's world, she was meticulous in her descriptions whether it's a place, a feeling or even the weather, leaving almost nothing to the imagination. However I didn't find it boring either, rather it felt more of a scholarly story to me because DHarkness really meshed her lore well with historical fact plus both Diana and Matthew are professors so you know there'll be bouts of trivial lecture somewhere.

SHADOW OF NIGHT is as daunting as it's predecessor, at 584 pages the story is filled with remarkable descriptions and facts about Elizabethan London. Famous historical figures join Matthew and Diana's journey like William Shakespeare and the detestable Christopher Marlowe. Again DHarkness didn't disappoint in making her version of 16th century England as factual as can be with a mist of supernatural creatures loitering the streets of London to make it exciting.
"Nonsense. Marrying amid bloodshed is a de Clermont family tradition. Phillipe said briskly. "We only seem to mate creatures who are desired by others."
DHarkness gleaned on the romance between Matthew and Diana, concentrating more on coupling historical tidbits with her alternative London. Some of you might disagree with me on this but I felt there were too many fillers in SHADOW OF NIGHT that I could do without. For example, chapter 7 was about present day Rima Jaen who, I am assuming, found Diana's journal and with her boss, they both considered the manuscript trash and never heard from them again. This chapter had no bearing to the totality of the story and an addition they could have edited out.
Mark me well, Diana: Lives will be lost because of your love for my son. Some will sacrifice themselves. Others will die because someone must, and it will be for you to decide if it is you or them or someone you love. - Phillipe
The core of SHADOW OF NIGHT was exciting and the story DHarkness is telling is truly wonderful. Matthew and Diana's forbidden romance provides all the dramatic trappings one expects from a typical PNR and all the opposing forces and insistent nay saying is enough for me to root for them. The historical background was accurate and even the liberties she took with Queen Elizabeth, Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeare were plausible once you remove the supernatural aspects. I love how authentic her details are like people's hygiene at that time down to the proper grip and handling of a quill for a more efficient way to write. She laid it like it is and probably romanticized some things to blunt the edges of how polluted and dangerous London was during this time.

But it's all these extra trimmings and frills that provided great distractions for me to get entranced by the story. The excessive details on things, like Diana's wedding dress for one, took its toll on me that halfway through I feel DHarkenss just gets a kick from reading her pretty words and carefully written prose. Towards the end reading SHADOW OF NIGHT felt more like a chore to me than an enjoyable past time.

On the flip side, since Discovery of Witches is being turned into a movie, I am sure I will fully appreciate and LOVE all the visuals the movie will provide because DHarkness spared no detail in painting her world in accurate detail. Now THAT is a movie adaptation I want to see soon.




4 comments:

  1. I actually really enjoyed reading all the descriptions - it's a bit different from other novels these days. I'd have to disagree about it leaving little to the imagination though as I'm still having a hard time imagining all the accroutement of 16th C. LOL

    And OMG!! I can't wait to see the casting!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you appreciated it better than I did. I loved how she portrayed Marlowe, very Faustus

      I think I will Love the movie more than the book.

      Delete
  2. The length of the first book scares me so I avoid reading it, I find too many details to be tedious to read and I'm not a huge fan of historical fiction so I think I might get bored midway. I didn't know it was being turned into a movie, I'm excited to see it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am excited for the movie, no disrespect to DHarkness but I think I'll be able to appreciate it more than the book. Her descriptions are so rich the screenwriter and props man got it easy on that aspect.

      Delete

This is a personal blog so posts are subjective, showing both positive and negative reviews/opinions. We like to be fair to everyone, authors and fans including ourselves. Our opinions are in no way a reflection of our followers nor are we speaking in their behalf.

Thanks for your comments, we really appreciate it. We hope to hear more from you.

P.S. Leave a note if we haven't followed you back.

Shareholic

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...